A flaw was found in Spacewalk up to version 2.9 where it was vulnerable to XML internal entity attacks via the /rpc/api endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could use this flaw to retrieve the content of certain files and trigger a denial of service, or in certain circumstances, execute arbitrary code on the Spacewalk server.
Huawei NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00; and Secospace USG6600 and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC200, V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00 have an input validation vulnerability where the IPSec module does not validate a field in a specific message. Attackers can send specific message to cause out-of-bound read, compromising normal service.
Huawei NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00SPC100; and Secospace USG6600 and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC200, V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00SPC100 have an information leakage vulnerability. Due to improper processing of some data, a local authenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability through a series of operations. Successful exploitation may cause information leakage.
Huawei products NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00SPC100; Secospace USG6600 versions V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00SPC100; and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00SPC100 have a denial of service vulnerability. Attackers need to perform a series of operations in a special scenario to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploit may cause the new connections can't be established, result in a denial of service.
taffy through 2.6.2 allows attackers to forge adding additional properties into user-input processed by taffy which can allow access to any data items in the DB. taffy sets an internal index for each data item in its DB. However, it is found that the internal index can be forged by adding additional properties into user-input. If index is found in the query, taffyDB will ignore other query conditions and directly return the indexed data item. Moreover, the internal index is in an easily-guessable format (e.g., T000002R000001). As such, attackers can use this vulnerability to access any data items in the DB.
Insufficient access control in the web interface of ABB Asset Suite versions 9.0 to 9.3, 9.4 prior to 126.96.36.199, 9.5 prior to 188.8.131.52 and 9.6.0 enables full access to directly referenced objects. An attacker with knowledge of a resource's URL can access the resource directly.
An issue was discovered in Zoho ManageEngine Remote Access Plus 10.0.447. The service to test the mail-server configuration suffers from an authorization issue allowing a user with the Guest role (read-only access) to use and abuse it. One of the abuses allows performing network and port scan operations of the localhost or the hosts on the same network segment, aka SSRF.
codecov-node npm module before 3.6.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.The value provided as part of the gcov-root argument is executed by the exec function within lib/codecov.js. This vulnerability exists due to an incomplete fix of CVE-2020-7596.
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-5005. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-5005. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-5005 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
The fetch function in OAuth/Curl.php in Dropbox-PHP, as used in ownCloud Server before 6.0.8, 7.x before 7.0.6, and 8.x before 8.0.4 when an external Dropbox storage has been mounted, allows remote administrators of Dropbox.com to read arbitrary files via an @ (at sign) character in unspecified POST values.
** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of the Jinja templating engine used in the Identity Provider (IdP) server in Ipsilon 0.1.0 before 1.0.1 does not enable auto-escaping, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via template variables. NOTE: This may be a duplicate of CVE-2015-5216. Moreover, the Jinja development team does not enable auto-escape by default for performance issues as explained in https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/master/faq/#why-is-autoescaping-not-the-default.
The Identity Provider (IdP) server in Ipsilon 0.1.0 before 1.0.1 does not properly escape certain characters in a Python exception-message template, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via an HTTP response.
Multiple incomplete blacklist vulnerabilities in the avatar upload functionality in manageuser.php in Collabtive before 2.1 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code by uploading a file with a (1) .php3, (2) .php4, (3) .php5, or (4) .phtml extension.
Kaseya Virtual System Administrator (VSA) 7.x before 184.108.40.206, 8.x before 220.127.116.11, 9.0 before 18.104.22.168, and 9.1 before 22.214.171.124 does not properly require authentication, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and (1) add an administrative account via crafted request to LocalAuth/setAccount.aspx or (2) write to and execute arbitrary files via a full pathname in the PathData parameter to ConfigTab/uploader.aspx.
The wpCentral plugin before 1.5.1 for WordPress allows disclosure of the connection key.
An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in all versions of OpenShift ServiceMesh (maistra) before 1.0.8 in the openshift/istio-kialia-rhel7-operator-container. An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges.
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (Orion Platform 2018, NPM 12.3, NetPath 1.1.3) allows XSS by authenticated users via a crafted onerror attribute of a VIDEO element in an action for an ALERT.
A Denial of Service (infinite loop) exists in OpenSIPS before 1.10 in lookup.c.
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-1454. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-1454. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-1454 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.